[情報] Olympus vs Panasonic 25mm (Robin Wong)

看板DSLR (單眼相機)作者 ( )時間12年前 (2014/02/16 21:10), 編輯推噓7(7014)
留言21則, 8人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
來自43 rumors http://ppt.cc/6xFr 值得注意的是測試用機身是O家新機E-M10,也許用P家機身結果會不一樣? 結論: 1) The Olympus lens is slightly wider in field of view than the Panasonic lens 同是25mm但Olympus視角大一點點?好像之前在其他鏡頭有過類似的討論。 2) The Olympus lens is *possibly 1/3 EV brighter than Panasonic lens (not conclusive, based on just quick observation on EXIF data) 同樣參數下Olympus鏡頭的結果可能比較亮。 3) There is not much difference in shallow depth of field rendering between F1.8 and F1.4 lenses (if point number 2 is true, the gap is bridged due to either the Olympus lens being 1/3 EV brighter than F1.8 or the Panasonic lens being 1/3 EV darker than F1.4. This is just my observation, not a conclusive statement) 兩者光圈全開時的散景差異不大。 4) Although Olympus magnification factor is 0.12x and Panasonic magnification factor is 0.11x, I find the close up shooting capability of Olympus lens to be significantly better than the Panasonic lens. O 25mm f/1.8實際放大率比P 25mm f/1.4大很多! 5) Panasonic lens has poorer CA control (especially shooting wide open) and corner sharpness than Olympus lens. 這在O家機身上應該不意外... 6) General sharpness between both lenses are almost identical 期待在P家機身上的測試! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 64.134.243.121 ※ 編輯: Lyapunov 來自: 64.134.243.121 (02/16 21:12)

02/16 21:28, , 1F
等我發吧
02/16 21:28, 1F

02/16 21:59, , 2F
鏡頭較廣跟比較亮有可能是什麼原因..?
02/16 21:59, 2F

02/16 22:01, , 3F
比較亮可能是鍍膜或其它影響?同是O家鏡12f2也是比12-50透亮
02/16 22:01, 3F

02/16 22:03, , 4F
O家鏡頭普遍較廣好像之前有討論過,忘了是哪篇...
02/16 22:03, 4F

02/16 22:04, , 5F
25/1.8優點被放大,弱點則是輕描淡寫過去。 等第三方評測
02/16 22:04, 5F

02/16 22:05, , 6F
較亮的部分其實他沒有真的去比數值,只是用肉眼判斷的。
02/16 22:05, 6F

02/16 22:06, , 7F
相比之下最吸引我的反而是最近對焦距離XD
02/16 22:06, 7F

02/16 22:19, , 8F
E-M10有修正色散啊~ 或許接到其他沒修正的O家機身就有差吧
02/16 22:19, 8F

02/16 22:21, , 9F
丟到BMPCC上面測好了XD
02/16 22:21, 9F

02/17 09:57, , 10F
這文章實在有些問題 @_@
02/17 09:57, 10F

02/17 10:59, , 11F
可以請樓上稍微提點一下問題點在哪裡嗎? 小弟眼殘沒有發現
02/17 10:59, 11F

02/17 11:07, , 12F
一開始的"50/1.4 vs 50/1.8"就很多不對
02/17 11:07, 12F

02/17 11:08, , 13F
簡言之f/1.8先天上就比f/1.4難度低很多
02/17 11:08, 13F

02/17 11:09, , 14F
以變形抑制/週邊畫質/像場平整度而言常會是50/1.8較好
02/17 11:09, 14F

02/17 11:09, , 15F
不過C/N的50/1.8都粗製濫造就是了
02/17 11:09, 15F

02/17 11:10, , 16F
O如果好好做25/1.8, 贏過P 25/1.4並不意外
02/17 11:10, 16F

02/17 11:10, , 17F
再來進光量的部分一直拿F光圈在講這觀念上就錯啦
02/17 11:10, 17F

02/17 11:11, , 18F
近拍測試一定哪裡有問題, 0.11x跟0.12x根本沒差那麼多
02/17 11:11, 18F

02/17 11:12, , 19F
不用去管最近對焦距離差多少
02/17 11:12, 19F

02/17 11:14, , 20F
原來A大指的是這些點,小弟受教了~
02/17 11:14, 20F

02/18 11:05, , 21F
推一下對C/N 50/1.8粗製爛造有同感
02/18 11:05, 21F
文章代碼(AID): #1J0BZLEA (DSLR)
文章代碼(AID): #1J0BZLEA (DSLR)