Re: [閒聊] ps高手=攝影大師嗎

看板DSLR (單眼相機)作者 (青山)時間11年前 (2015/01/06 19:34), 11年前編輯推噓10(1003)
留言13則, 11人參與, 最新討論串4/5 (看更多)
關于后制的限制,我們社(Getty Images)有個專門的文檔,分享給大家。 GETTY IMAGES COMPANY POLICY on NON-MANIPULATION of EDITORIAL NEWS & SPORT PHOTOGRAPHY 1 INTRODUCTION Changing the editorial content of any image is unacceptable. This newly updated document serves as a reminder of our company policy regarding the importance of not manipulating editorial photos in our News and Sport collections (in conjunction with our Editorial Integrity Policy, http://www.gettyimages.com/Corporate/EditorialPolicy.aspx) and includes a clarification on our policy regarding the use of on- and in-camera filters and specialty lenses. Photo manipulation (i.e. changing the content of a photograph) is a very serious issue in the editorial photo industry. It is imperative that we maintain our editorial integrity with both our customers and competitors. Any mistake may breach industry standards and jeopardize our business practices. Ultimately, it comes down to sound judgment and careful application of your individual Photoshop skills. Less is more. If you feel that you have a question about a specific case, you can ask your DOP, the Picture Desk Editors or Cole Porter at any time. 2 GENERAL POLICY 2.1 Acceptable Changes ?Cropping ?Minor color adjustments / corrections ?Limited lightening or darkening ?Limited sharpening ?Removal of dust spots (caused by a dirty lens ?or sensor) ?Converting a color image to black & white ?Removal of Red Eye (caused by Flash Photography) ?as long as it does not affect the context of the photograph 2.2 Unacceptable Changes Any other changes not included in the preceding list of Acceptable Changes, including but not limited to the following: ?Adding objects or information that were not in the original photograph ?Deleting or obscuring objects or information that were visible in the original photograph ?Extreme lightening, darkening, color- and contrast adjustments using Photoshop or any other computer software (e.g. making a grey sky blue, a blue sky orange etc.) ?Creating an extreme silhouette from a correctly exposed photogcraph 2.3 Exceptions Digital composite images, usually done to create panoramic images to overcome equipment limitations, are acceptable with an Editor’s Note: (EDITORS NOTE: Image is a digital [panoramic] composite.) 3 ON- and IN-CAMERA FILTERS 3.1 All EMEA and AsiaPac Editorial Photographers The use of on- and in-camera filters (including polarizing, graduated, star burst or special effects filter) is acceptable for these photographers at any editorial event they cover globally. However, any photographs created by using these filters must include the following line at the front of the caption field and special instructions field (see caption example on the right): (EDITORS NOTE: A special effects camera filter was used for this image.) It is the responsibility of the individual photographer who has taken a photograph with a filter to make sure that this Editor’s Note is added on each photograph before it is transmitted to the Global Picture Desk, directly to our feeds or our site. If material has been edited and captioned by a field editor it is still the responsibility of the photographer to inform the editor that a filter has been used and make sure the Editors Note is in the caption. 3.2 All North America Editorial Photographers Editorial photographers are not to use any special effects filters for any live editorial coverage they are assigned to globally. This includes the use of lens babies or other special effects devices. Real variable focal plane lenses (tilt/shift lenses) are okay to use. The sole exception to this policy is the legitimate use when necessary of a polarizing filter. If a polarizing filter is used, then the following Editors Note must be added to the front of the caption field and the Special Instructions field as stated above: (EDITORS NOTE: A polarizing filter was used for this image.) If a tilt/shift lens is used, the Editors Note should read: (EDITORS NOTE: This image was created using a variable planed lens.) 3.3 Distribution of filtered photographs on the live feeds. 1) Any photographs taken using polarizing filters may be distributed on all live feeds as long as the appropriate Editor’s Note appears in the caption field and special instructions field. The same applies to any photographs taken using tilt/shift lenses, as well as digital panoramic composites, provided the above mentioned Editor’s Note is applied and the edit that goes out on the feed supplements the regular editorial coverage rather than make up the majority of it. 2) Any photographs taken with special effects filters by EMEA/AsiaPac photographers are not to go to the North American wire feed – without exception. These pictures can, however, be sent out on the other live feeds and appear on the editorial site provided the proper Editor’s Note regarding filter use has been applied. 4 SUMMARY The above rules apply to all people who are involved at any stage in the production and distribution of editorial photographs, whether live or non-live production. This updated policy supersedes any previous versions. It forms part of Getty Images’ Resource Guide and as such does not constitute a contract or promise of specific treatment in specific circumstances. It may be amended by the company from time to time in its sole discretion. Please note that due to the serious business implications of failing to adhere to these guidelines a breach of this policy may constitute gross misconduct and lead to summary dismissal or termination, as applicable. Such determination shall be made in Getty Images’ sole discretion.4 SUMMARY The above rules apply to all people who are involved at any stage in the production and distribution of editorial photographs, whether live or non-live production. This updated policy supersedes any previous versions. It forms part of Getty Images’ Resource Guide and as such does not constitute a contract or promise of specific treatment in specific circumstances. It may be amended by the company from time to time in its sole discretion. Please note that due to the serious business implications of failing to adhere to these guidelines a breach of this policy may constitute gross misconduct and lead to summary dismissal or termination, as applicable. Such determination shall be made in Getty Images’ sole discretion. ※ 引述《czqs2000 (青山)》之銘言: : 小弟是中國人,打字就不太在意簡繁了。 : 這個問題得分什么攝影師了。 : 如果你是新聞攝影師,那顯然你不能后制,后制就是作弊。 : 如果你是紀實攝影師,那么可以適當后制,比如改變一下整體色調什么的。 : 如果你是風光攝影師,那么可以多做后制,不后制基本沒法看。 : 如果你是商業攝影師,那么就一定要后制,不后制沒人會付錢給你。 : ※ 引述《boomb (playtwo)》之銘言: : : 因為看到很多厲害的攝影大師照片 : : 感覺都是經過後製才呈現出來的 : : 原始的照片應該是普通吧(不讓人有驚嚇到美呆了? : : 有那種網站是有分享原始照片跟ps或者lr等處理過的照片比較的嗎 : : 不然我覺得只要拍照會構圖就好了 : : 相機也不用是多好的 愛瘋就足夠了 : : 雖然我對構圖還是不太行 : : 但最近感覺後製比拍照重要 : : 因為拍照只是興趣 : : 想要呈現很美的照片卻是要經過後製 : : .... : : 還是我錯了呢 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.113.72.173 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/DSLR/M.1420544050.A.B9D.html

01/06 20:02, , 1F
剛剛Google了一下Getty Images 好大一間
01/06 20:02, 1F

01/06 20:43, , 2F
請問getty image要怎麼進去呢? 您是全職?
01/06 20:43, 2F
編輯邀請,我是stringer,介于contributor和staff之間

01/06 20:44, , 3F
平生不識Getty Images 便稱攝影師也枉然
01/06 20:44, 3F
不敢…… ※ 編輯: czqs2000 (114.113.72.173), 01/06/2015 20:46:56

01/06 21:36, , 4F
已羨慕...
01/06 21:36, 4F

01/06 21:41, , 5F
問一個冒昧的問題,Getty的edtorial也是抽七成嗎?
01/06 21:41, 5F
六成五

01/06 21:45, , 6F
感謝分享! 不過其實看了裡面的內容, 對我來說, 那些
01/06 21:45, 6F

01/06 21:46, , 7F
Acceptable changes 對我來說都已經算是後製了 XD
01/06 21:46, 7F
※ 編輯: czqs2000 (114.113.72.173), 01/06/2015 21:47:37

01/06 22:06, , 8F
專業
01/06 22:06, 8F

01/06 23:00, , 9F
Google完Getty Images覺得終於對學習攝影有一點目標
01/06 23:00, 9F

01/06 23:00, , 10F
了!
01/06 23:00, 10F

01/07 11:09, , 11F
getty images很邱啊!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
01/07 11:09, 11F

01/07 12:47, , 12F
喔喔,原來如此…………………………求翻譯
01/07 12:47, 12F

01/09 10:56, , 13F
這個超秋的阿
01/09 10:56, 13F
文章代碼(AID): #1KgyWokT (DSLR)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1KgyWokT (DSLR)