[心得] ultra plusII 240G與extreme pro480G測試

看板Storage_Zone (儲存裝置)作者 (司馬雲)時間10年前 (2015/12/14 23:50), 編輯推噓2(2010)
留言12則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/1
趁gohappy特價,敗了三顆ssd,兩顆是ultra plusII 240G 是老弟跟老媽要的 還有一顆是extreme pro 480G 是我要用的 先說一下,extreme pro重量比ultra plusII還重 應該是多一倍的容量,顆粒比較多的關系? ultra plusII 240G 545讀,503寫,讀取比extreme pro快上一點點 smart資料 http://i.imgur.com/xPINGgc.jpg
HD Tune寫入測試 http://i.imgur.com/ibyeXqP.png
在1/10容量,也就是24gb的地方就掉下去了,不過速度還有200多MB/s CrystalDiskMark http://i.imgur.com/AnYeuif.jpg
----------------------------------------------------------------------- CrystalDiskMark 5.1.0 Shizuku Edition x64 (C) 2007-2015 hiyohiyo Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- * MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s] * KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 524.807 MB/s Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 503.083 MB/s Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 269.137 MB/s [ 65707.3 IOPS] Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 282.324 MB/s [ 68926.8 IOPS] Sequential Read (T= 1) : 508.539 MB/s Sequential Write (T= 1) : 481.969 MB/s Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 32.082 MB/s [ 7832.5 IOPS] Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 68.833 MB/s [ 16804.9 IOPS] Test : 1024 MiB [N: 0.0% (0.1/223.6 GiB)] (x5) [Interval=5 sec] Date : 2015/12/14 20:45:53 OS : Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64) Extrem PRO 480G 537讀524寫 先測過才抓smart資料,所以已經有寫入 http://i.imgur.com/J2oleBc.jpg
HD tune寫入測試,一條線XD http://i.imgur.com/ySU6o1k.png
CrystalDiskMark http://i.imgur.com/a7waiew.jpg
----------------------------------------------------------------------- CrystalDiskMark 5.1.0 Shizuku Edition x64 (C) 2007-2015 hiyohiyo Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- * MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s] * KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 536.898 MB/s Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 523.481 MB/s Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 264.890 MB/s [ 64670.4 IOPS] Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 286.598 MB/s [ 69970.2 IOPS] Sequential Read (T= 1) : 529.806 MB/s Sequential Write (T= 1) : 499.314 MB/s Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 31.709 MB/s [ 7741.5 IOPS] Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 68.952 MB/s [ 16834.0 IOPS] Test : 1024 MiB [N: 0.0% (0.1/447.1 GiB)] (x5) [Interval=5 sec] Date : 2015/12/14 20:19:01 OS : Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64) -- 鉛華洗盡,偎江感雲 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.132.147.49 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Storage_Zone/M.1450108202.A.B0A.html

12/15 01:09, , 1F
照這樣看 Ultra plus搞不好掉速還比plus誇張
12/15 01:09, 1F

12/15 01:13, , 2F
第一顆應是Ultra II 典型的cache耗盡後降至TLC真實
12/15 01:13, 2F

12/15 01:13, , 3F
速度
12/15 01:13, 3F

12/15 01:14, , 4F
MLC顆粒的Ultra Plus會好一點 但看是不是接受台系主
12/15 01:14, 4F

12/15 01:14, , 5F
控了
12/15 01:14, 5F

12/15 01:34, , 6F
第一張確實是Ultra II
12/15 01:34, 6F

12/15 01:34, , 7F
Ultra Plus的方案和X110一樣
12/15 01:34, 7F

12/15 01:35, , 8F
不過Ultra II韌體有下足功夫, 性能一致性不錯
12/15 01:35, 8F

12/15 01:37, , 9F
所以Ultra Plus不是台廠主控喔, SSD Plus才是
12/15 01:37, 9F

12/15 01:42, , 10F
是的 我把Ultra Plus跟SSD Plus搞混了(汗....
12/15 01:42, 10F

12/15 01:43, , 11F
不論是X110或Ultra Plus 都已經在通路上消失已久
12/15 01:43, 11F

12/15 01:44, , 12F
X110網拍是還買的到, Ultra Plus真的看不到惹
12/15 01:44, 12F
文章代碼(AID): #1MRkKgiA (Storage_Zone)
文章代碼(AID): #1MRkKgiA (Storage_Zone)