[分享] GNOME or KDE? The Old Question Is New Today

看板Linux作者 (ccc)時間13年前 (2013/04/12 16:36), 編輯推噓9(9016)
留言25則, 13人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://www.datamation.com/open-source/gnome-or-kde-the-old-question-is-new-today-1.html GNOME or KDE? The Old Question Is New Today (我會貼這篇 一定是作者說了 KDE 好話 XDD) 作者比較了幾個項目 不過沒有列出數據 而且大多是主觀的想法 詳細的內容 請連到原網址觀看 Performance and Memory Demands Verdict: 1st place: Cinnamon/Mate and KDE are tied. 2nd place: GNOME 3. 3rd place: Unity. Ease of Use Verdict: First, Cinnamon/Mate, followed by KDE, Unity and GNOME 3 -- in that order. I use mobile devices, but I've never reconciled myself to their finicky interfaces. The Desktop Design Philosophy Verdict: With its skill at innovating while preserving tradition, KDE easily takes first place. Cinnamon/Mate's welcomes incremental changes at best, but its popularity wins second place. The last position is a tie between GNOME 3 and Unity, which are intellectually interesting, but often seem to display a paternalistic attitude towards users. Application Design Verdict: A fourway tie. Both the minimalist and maximalist approaches are admirable in their own way, although I admit I prefer the maximalist. But since there are very few compromises — if any — between these two extremes, I refuse to choose between them. Unique Features Verdict: It's no contest. KDE takes first. Trailing far behind is GNOME 3 in second, followed by Unity in an equally distant third. Cinnamon/Mate takes fourth for participation, as much as anything else. -- KDE 固定聚會:每週二晚上在 Mix Coffee & Tea (與 TOSSUG 一起) KDE Taiwan G+:https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/114095232656344072201 KDE-TW Froum:https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/kde-tw My Blog:http://blog.acelan.idv.tw -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.221.51.174

04/12 18:06, , 1F
mate是gtk2的,怎麼會跟cinnamon or kde打平手?
04/12 18:06, 1F

04/12 18:06, , 2F
我是指效能方面
04/12 18:06, 2F

04/12 18:39, , 3F
萬年戰文啊 ... XD
04/12 18:39, 3F

04/12 18:41, , 4F
KDE比GNOME好用+1 ...但是有些軟體不要裝
04/12 18:41, 4F

04/12 21:00, , 5F
KDE 的效能不差吧
04/12 21:00, 5F

04/12 21:01, , 6F
應該說 Qt 4 之後整個效能就大躍進了
04/12 21:01, 6F

04/12 21:32, , 7F
純推Gnome2 or classic
04/12 21:32, 7F

04/14 19:40, , 8F
有人測試過Qt與gtk2的效能,結果是Qt的效能比較好
04/14 19:40, 8F

04/15 07:22, , 10F
不過plasma的桌面用的很不習慣 +_+
04/15 07:22, 10F

04/15 07:22, , 11F
效能是一回事 windows manager又是一回事
04/15 07:22, 11F

04/15 07:23, , 12F
不過寫app來講 我實在不想用GTK寫... XD
04/15 07:23, 12F

04/15 08:51, , 13F
GTK 只是 C code 寫起來醜一點啊 XD 很適合不愛 C++ 的人
04/15 08:51, 13F

04/15 08:54, , 14F
如果沒有要考慮 MS 平台,GTK 是蠻好用的啦
04/15 08:54, 14F

04/15 08:55, , 15F
GTK2 在 Windows 上要綁一大包 runtime,不知道 3 有沒有
04/15 08:55, 15F

04/15 08:55, , 16F
比較好一點。
04/15 08:55, 16F

04/15 14:52, , 17F
好像只有我是用Gnome3用爽爽的...? OAO
04/15 14:52, 17F

04/15 14:52, , 18F
不過這是單就在筆電上用很爽, 桌機或大螢幕還是比較喜
04/15 14:52, 18F

04/15 14:54, , 19F
歡cinnamon
04/15 14:54, 19F

04/15 14:55, , 20F
KDE是一直覺得太肥又太繁複, 敬謝不敏 orz
04/15 14:55, 20F

04/15 19:37, , 21F
我愛gnome3.kde塞了一堆我用不到的東西
04/15 19:37, 21F

04/15 20:36, , 22F
其實KDE的笨重感在Arch中看不到(分包很細
04/15 20:36, 22F

04/15 20:36, , 23F
可以試試看Chakra,算是很儉約的版本
04/15 20:36, 23F

04/16 01:20, , 24F
KDE派 +1
04/16 01:20, 24F

09/26 23:03, , 25F
09/26 23:03, 25F
文章代碼(AID): #1HPyU18l (Linux)
文章代碼(AID): #1HPyU18l (Linux)