[測試] Ramdisk大亂鬥:Buffalo/Dataram/ImDisk …
作者 capri75 (capri) 看板 Storage_Zone
標題 [測試] Ramdisk大亂鬥:Buffalo/Dataram/ImDisk/QSoft/VSuite/SuperS
時間 Fri Feb 18 00:09:44 2011
───────────────────────────────────────
既然要做Ramdisk測試
那就乾脆多做幾間的比較
來個大亂鬥 XD
先把心得說在前面
數據看起來很怪
Dataram狂輸Vsuite
加上ImDisk的部分寫入異常低落
我覺得奇怪的部分都有重複測過至少三次
變化不大
這次測試感覺用處不大
但想說都已經花時間測完了
還是PO上來給大家鞭一鞭
不知道到底哪裡出了問題...
===============================
測試環境
i3-530
DDR3-1333 12G(威剛4G*3)
ASrock H55M-GE
Win7 x64 (剛重灌完的狀態 僅安裝驅動程式與win更新 關UAC)
===============================
測試對象
SuperSpeed RamDisk Plus 11.5.390 x64 (15天試用版)
http://www.superspeed.com/desktop/ramdisk.php
ImDisk Virtual Disk Driver 1.4.0 (freeware)
http://www.ltr-data.se/opencode.html/#ImDisk
BUFFALO RAMDISK ユーティリティー Ver.3.0.0.0 (freeware)
http://buffalo.jp/download/driver/memory/ramdisk.html
Dataram RAMdisk V3.5.130R17 (4G以內免費)
http://memory.dataram.com/products-and-services/software/ramdisk
QSsoft RAMDisk "Enterprise" 5.3.2.12 (試用版)
http://members.fortunecity.com/ramdisk/RAMDisk/ramdiskent.htm
(網頁似乎故障 我稍早下載時還是正常的)
VSuite Ramdisk 服务器版 V4.6.7531.1240 (15天試用版)
http://www.romexsoftware.com/zh-cn/index.html
================================
測試設定
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8246392/Ramdisk/Status%20of%206%20ramdisks.png
六個ramdisk
全都從官方網站下載並安裝
1G容量
FAT32格式
4096位元組配置單位
沒有放置任何檔案或其他系統設定(如pagefile 系統變數或IE暫存等)
以ATTO Disk Benchmark v2.46與Crystal Disk Mark 3.0.1 x64兩個軟體測試
(同一時間內只對一個磁碟進行一項軟體測試)
* QSoft設定system memory跟resident memory兩者跑出來的效能有天壤之別
新設定值：2G空間 fat32 4k resident memory
================================
測試結果
(以下兩張實測圖)
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8246392/Ramdisk/Test%20of%206%20ramdisks.png
跟原本測試軟體的設定不一樣 但影響測試最大的是ramdisk軟體內部參數
* 新增Vsuite SCSI與Direct IO兩種模式的比較
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8246392/Ramdisk/Test%20of%20VSuiteD%26S.png
(以下是CDM的數據 ATTO無法複製數據就沒貼上來了 請看圖)
(順序同上述試軟體列表 由上而下)
Superspeed
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 2825.658 MB/s
Sequential Write : 3824.382 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 2864.360 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 4120.530 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 1004.093 MB/s [245139.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 800.172 MB/s [195354.4 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 855.039 MB/s [208749.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 718.636 MB/s [175448.1 IOPS]
Test : 500 MB [H: 0.0% (0.0/1015.7 MB)] (x5)
Date : 2011/02/17 23:14:00
OS : Windows 7 Enterprise Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x64)
ImDisk
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 2830.743 MB/s
Sequential Write : 3739.324 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 2725.704 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 3592.974 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 665.506 MB/s [162477.1 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 589.126 MB/s [143829.5 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 1226.779 MB/s [299506.7 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 1092.316 MB/s [266678.6 IOPS]
Test : 500 MB [N: 0.0% (0.0/1020.0 MB)] (x5)
Date : 2011/02/17 23:15:48
OS : Windows 7 Enterprise Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x64)
Buffalo
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 2513.116 MB/s
Sequential Write : 2980.845 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 2375.121 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 2908.344 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 264.568 MB/s [ 64591.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 249.583 MB/s [ 60933.3 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 250.477 MB/s [ 61151.5 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 242.354 MB/s [ 59168.4 IOPS]
Test : 500 MB [W: 0.0% (0.0/1055.0 MB)] (x5)
Date : 2011/02/17 23:16:04
OS : Windows 7 Enterprise Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x64)
Dataram
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 2830.280 MB/s
Sequential Write : 3663.300 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 2859.277 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 3460.336 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 517.545 MB/s [126353.6 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 468.815 MB/s [114456.8 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 478.935 MB/s [116927.6 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 426.810 MB/s [104201.6 IOPS]
Test : 500 MB [X: 0.0% (0.0/1017.0 MB)] (x5)
Date : 2011/02/17 23:16:17
OS : Windows 7 Enterprise Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x64)
QSoft (system memory)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 2859.280 MB/s
Sequential Write : 3749.898 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 1596.267 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 1877.264 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 28.987 MB/s [ 7076.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 28.698 MB/s [ 7006.3 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 28.673 MB/s [ 7000.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 29.011 MB/s [ 7082.7 IOPS]
Test : 500 MB [Y: 0.0% (0.0/1020.0 MB)] (x5)
Date : 2011/02/17 23:16:26
OS : Windows 7 Enterprise Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x64)
重測!!! QSoft (resident memory)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 3028.135 MB/s
Sequential Write : 4112.063 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 2979.207 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 4300.418 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 1234.472 MB/s [301384.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 891.984 MB/s [217769.6 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 1024.416 MB/s [250101.5 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 763.248 MB/s [186339.9 IOPS]
Test : 1000 MB [Y: 0.0% (0.0/2032.0 MB)] (x5)
Date : 2011/02/18 3:50:29
OS : Windows 7 Enterprise Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x64)
VSuite
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 2945.438 MB/s
Sequential Write : 3617.561 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 2974.981 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 3663.994 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 908.404 MB/s [221778.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 748.220 MB/s [182670.9 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 757.439 MB/s [184921.7 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 671.113 MB/s [163846.0 IOPS]
Test : 500 MB [Z: 0.0% (0.0/1022.0 MB)] (x5)
Date : 2011/02/17 23:16:34
OS : Windows 7 Enterprise Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x64)
感謝xzx網友提示
以下補上Vsuite Server的SCSI與Direct IO兩者比較
都設為1.1G FAT32 4k
Vsuite (SCSI)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 2964.542 MB/s
Sequential Write : 4009.518 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 2938.039 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 3957.484 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 840.426 MB/s [205182.1 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 632.355 MB/s [154383.6 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 708.408 MB/s [172951.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 532.425 MB/s [129986.7 IOPS]
Test : 1000 MB [W: 0.0% (0.0/1097.8 MB)] (x5)
Date : 2011/02/18 21:59:09
OS : Windows 7 Enterprise Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x64)
Vsuite (Direct IO)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 2935.736 MB/s
Sequential Write : 4064.905 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 2956.984 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 4008.030 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 1049.712 MB/s [256277.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 784.249 MB/s [191467.1 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 873.656 MB/s [213294.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 681.871 MB/s [166472.4 IOPS]
Test : 1000 MB [X: 0.0% (0.0/1097.8 MB)] (x5)
Date : 2011/02/18 21:59:29
OS : Windows 7 Enterprise Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x64)
================================
簡單結論
1. 整體效能評比: Superspeed > Vsuite > ImDisk > Dataram > Buffalo > Qsoft
更正!
QSoft > Vsuite(D) > Superspeed > Vsuite(S) > ImDisk > Dataram > Buffalo
2. ImDisk 4K QD32特強 但ATTO的128k 256k寫入異常低落 ???
3. 這六款軟體中 只有Buffalo在OS啟動前就產生Ramdisk
4. 我主觀評比:
V功能最強大 B最簡潔直覺 D介於V跟B之間
I Q S的設定介面都不好用
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.166.224.225
推
02/18 00:14, , 1F
02/18 00:14, 1F
→
02/18 00:21, , 2F
02/18 00:21, 2F
→
02/18 00:21, , 3F
02/18 00:21, 3F
→
02/18 00:30, , 4F
02/18 00:30, 4F
→
02/18 00:30, , 5F
02/18 00:30, 5F
推
02/18 01:04, , 6F
02/18 01:04, 6F
→
02/18 01:04, , 7F
02/18 01:04, 7F
→
02/18 01:07, , 8F
02/18 01:07, 8F
推
02/18 01:09, , 9F
02/18 01:09, 9F
→
02/18 01:09, , 10F
02/18 01:09, 10F
→
02/18 01:12, , 11F
02/18 01:12, 11F
→
02/18 01:56, , 12F
02/18 01:56, 12F
推
02/18 02:14, , 13F
02/18 02:14, 13F
→
02/18 02:21, , 14F
02/18 02:21, 14F
→
02/18 02:22, , 15F
02/18 02:22, 15F
→
02/18 02:24, , 16F
02/18 02:24, 16F
修正QSoft測試 Orz......
→
02/18 13:51, , 17F
02/18 13:51, 17F
→
02/18 13:52, , 18F
02/18 13:52, 18F
→
02/18 13:52, , 19F
02/18 13:52, 19F
→
02/18 13:52, , 20F
02/18 13:52, 20F
→
02/18 14:11, , 21F
02/18 14:11, 21F
→
02/18 14:14, , 22F
02/18 14:14, 22F
推
02/18 14:21, , 23F
02/18 14:21, 23F
推
02/18 16:54, , 24F
02/18 16:54, 24F
→
02/18 17:27, , 25F
02/18 17:27, 25F
→
02/18 17:27, , 26F
02/18 17:27, 26F
→
02/18 17:28, , 27F
02/18 17:28, 27F
→
02/18 17:29, , 28F
02/18 17:29, 28F
→
02/18 17:29, , 29F
02/18 17:29, 29F
→
02/18 17:30, , 30F
02/18 17:30, 30F
→
02/18 17:30, , 31F
02/18 17:30, 31F
推
02/18 17:31, , 32F
02/18 17:31, 32F
→
02/18 17:31, , 33F
02/18 17:31, 33F
→
02/18 17:31, , 34F
02/18 17:31, 34F
推
02/18 20:25, , 35F
02/18 20:25, 35F
→
02/18 20:26, , 36F
02/18 20:26, 36F
→
02/18 20:27, , 37F
02/18 20:27, 37F
→
02/18 20:28, , 38F
02/18 20:28, 38F
→
02/18 20:29, , 39F
02/18 20:29, 39F
→
02/18 20:30, , 40F
02/18 20:30, 40F
謝謝xzx提點 DirectIO效能的確比SCSI好上一截 原文已附上測試數據與圖
※ 編輯: capri75 來自: 118.166.224.225 (02/18 22:06)
→
02/18 22:25, , 41F
02/18 22:25, 41F
→
02/18 22:25, , 42F
02/18 22:25, 42F
→
02/18 22:25, , 43F
02/18 22:25, 43F
→
02/18 22:29, , 44F
02/18 22:29, 44F
→
02/18 22:29, , 45F
02/18 22:29, 45F
→
02/18 22:29, , 46F
02/18 22:29, 46F
→
02/19 01:44, , 47F
02/19 01:44, 47F
推
02/19 09:21, , 48F
02/19 09:21, 48F
→
02/19 11:31, , 49F
02/19 11:31, 49F
→
02/19 11:31, , 50F
02/19 11:31, 50F
→
02/19 11:34, , 51F
02/19 11:34, 51F
→
02/19 11:41, , 52F
02/19 11:41, 52F
→
02/19 11:41, , 53F
02/19 11:41, 53F
→
02/19 11:42, , 54F
02/19 11:42, 54F
→
02/19 11:43, , 55F
02/19 11:43, 55F
→
02/19 11:43, , 56F
02/19 11:43, 56F
→
02/19 11:44, , 57F
02/19 11:44, 57F
→
02/19 11:45, , 58F
02/19 11:45, 58F
→
02/19 11:45, , 59F
02/19 11:45, 59F
EZsoft 近期熱門文章
PTT數位生活區 即時熱門文章
