[情報] 2012/6/18 X64防火牆排名
官網:
http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge-64/results.php
1.Comodo Internet Security Premium 5.9.219863.2196FREE 94 %
2.Outpost Security Suite Pro 7.5.2.3939.602.1809 86 %
3.VirusBuster Internet Security Suite 4.1 71 %
4.Jetico Personal Firewall 2.1.0.10.2451 59 %
5.Privatefirewall 7.0.25.5FREE 56 %
6.ESET Smart Security 5.2.9.1 51 %
7.ZoneAlarm Extreme Security 2012 10.1.079.000 43 %
8.Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 12.0.0.374 28 %
9.Total Defense Internet Security Suite 8.0.0.87 21 %
10.avast! Internet Security 6.0.1367 15 %
11.Dr.Web Security Space 7.0.0.10140 11 %
12.Norton Internet Security 2012 19.5.0.145 10 %
13.Bitdefender Total Security 2012 15.0.36.1530 9 %
14.TrustPort Total Protection 2012 12.0.0.4860 8 %
15.Norman Security Suite PRO 9.00 6 %
15.PC Tools Internet Security 2012 9.0.0.898 6 %
15.Webroot SecureAnywhere Complete 2012 8.0.1.165 6 %
18.eScan Internet Security Suite 11.0.1139.1150 5 %
18.FortKnox Personal Firewall 8.0.205.0 5 %
18.G Data TotalSecurity 2012 22.1.0.0 5 %
21.Avira Internet Security 2012 12.0.0.832 4 %
22.Ad-Aware Total Security 21.1.0.30 3 %
22.AVG Internet Security 2012.0.1890 3 %
22.BullGuard Internet Security 12.0.218 3 %
22.F-Secure Internet Security 2012 12.44.110 3 %
22.K7 TotalSecurity 2012 12.1.0.119 3 %
22.McAfee Total Protection 2012 11.0.623 3 %
22.Panda Global Protection 2012 5.01.00 3 %
22.Rising Internet Security 2011 23.00.55.71 3 %
---------------------------------------------
這次新增兩家結果,ESET 和 K7。
對這兩家的評論
ESET Smart Security goes up by 18 %. It is clear that the new HIPS feature in
ESET Smart Security is under development and it is getting better and better
with every bigger update. There still are some unsolved problems and
uncovered attack methods that prevent ESET Smart Security to join the
products at the top of the table in Proactive Security Challenge 64, but the
progress is evident. We hope to see even more improvements in this product in
the future, keep up good work!
K7 TotalSecurity was tested for the first time in our challenge. Although the
product's interface suggests its security might have a potential to pass many
tests in our challenge, it was not the case. This product is somehow broken.
It can be configured so that it seems that various attacking techniques
should be blocked, but they are not. This problem was confirmed by two
independent testers. And this is why its final result is as low as 3 %.
http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge-64/
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.37.144.1
→
06/20 12:22, , 1F
06/20 12:22, 1F
推
06/20 15:30, , 2F
06/20 15:30, 2F
→
06/20 15:33, , 3F
06/20 15:33, 3F
推
06/20 15:39, , 4F
06/20 15:39, 4F
→
06/20 15:50, , 5F
06/20 15:50, 5F
→
06/20 16:18, , 6F
06/20 16:18, 6F
→
06/21 04:25, , 7F
06/21 04:25, 7F
→
06/21 22:44, , 8F
06/21 22:44, 8F
→
06/22 02:52, , 9F
06/22 02:52, 9F
→
06/22 02:52, , 10F
06/22 02:52, 10F
推
06/22 14:39, , 11F
06/22 14:39, 11F
→
06/22 15:54, , 12F
06/22 15:54, 12F
推
06/22 23:32, , 13F
06/22 23:32, 13F
→
06/22 23:33, , 14F
06/22 23:33, 14F
→
06/22 23:34, , 15F
06/22 23:34, 15F
→
06/22 23:34, , 16F
06/22 23:34, 16F
→
06/22 23:34, , 17F
06/22 23:34, 17F
→
06/22 23:36, , 18F
06/22 23:36, 18F
→
06/22 23:37, , 19F
06/22 23:37, 19F
AntiVirus 近期熱門文章
PTT數位生活區 即時熱門文章